Jeremy Goldstein on the pros of knockout options

Many companies are taking an about turn when it comes to the matters of stock options. Stock options are a means of workers compensation in which they are given a chance to buy a certain proportion of the company’ shares. However, in these days many companies are opting to withdraw the stock options for so that they can make more saving among other reasons. According to an advocate of knockout options, stock options are a better way of compensating workers when compared to other options such as equities, insurance, and higher wages. Stock options have the advantage of making the employees remain dedicated to their duties since they know a good stock value will improve their portfolio in the company.

 

For companies that are withdrawing stock options, they cite decline of stock values as an issue that creates a complicated scenario for them since the situation leads to overhang. A position that may put the stature of the company in the eyes of shareholders and investors in jeopardy.

 

Stock options usually work on the same basis as the normal stock. Once the stock value falls too low, they lose value and the employees risk losing them. The knockout option offers companies a chance to operate with stock options but in a workable method. Knockout options do not risk the investment of non-employees. This will mean that the company will not have to worry that the share value of the investors will be affected by a loss in value of the stocks.

 

Knockout options create a scenario where the company spends less in compensating executive members of the company. Adoption of stock options by companies as Jeremy Goldstein recommends can work well for companies that are into that method of workers compensation.

 

Jeremy Goldstein is a lawyer with the Jeremy L. Goldstein &Associates. Jeremy Goldstein is an authority when it comes to issues of corporate governance and executive compensation.

 

Connect with Jeremy Goldstein on LinkedIn.